We can but try, Bob, we can but try … 
And, speaking of trying, amongst my carryings-on over the weekend, and alternating with regular planking work, I also had a first look at the bow planking.
The four central planks at the bows do not have joggled ends, but will fit into a rounded section of the waterways; they also incorporate the underlay for the foremost bowsprit ring, so I began by making up and glueing together this section of planking on the worktable, making it slightly too long …

… so that it could be offered up and trimmed to follow the bow profile; in á siilar manner I also produced and trimmed the four surrounding planks, which are to be joggled.

I then got a short length of brass L profile, 8×8 mm outer dimensions, a scalpel and a pencil …

… and scored in the joggling cuts and marked out the forrard curvature of the central section, relative to the hull outer line.

The joggled planks were then cut as scored and had their ends squared off, while the central section was sawed off and then trimmed down to the pencil line.
As the below photo shows, this clearly revealed what I'd expected to see, namely that the port side of the bows is a tad more bluff than the starboard side.
I don't find it disastrously out of whack, and so could live with it as-is, but before I commit (all this is so far only dryfitted) to anything, I shall do a quick transfer of the starboard outline to the port side, to even better visualise the difference between the twain, and then have a good, hard think about whether ot not it would be worthwile to try to file and sand away at least a little of that port side bluffness …
We'll have to see, though, as it depends on how much material would have to be removed! Although the uppermost quarter inch or so of the hull is in one way or another (GRP, epoxy, P38 filler or wood) quite solid, care would still have to be taken that not so much of the edge disappear that it would have an averse effect on the flare of the hull, as once below that topmost quarter inch, the thickness of the material is just that of the GRP moulding and thus cannot be reduced.
Also, I strongly suspect that once the bowsprit is in place, partially obscuring this particular part of the decking, the assymetry will no longer be all that obvious.
All in alll, 'tis food for thought!

I also did a very quick and dirty test of my idea for a method to match the waterways with the planking. A small piece of tracing paper was put under the end of the planking, the outline of said planking drawn on to the paper and then transferred to some pear sheet, cut out and trimmed to shape.
Although the piece offered up in the below photo will have to be discraded (it is a tad too short at it's starboard end, I think the method shows promise; this test was done on the fly, and still produced a decent enough fit of the curve, so with a tad more care …
The below picture also made me realise that for the joggled planks, it would be better to switch the caulking pattern on the starboard side of the deck. So far I have, for ease of mass production, glued caulking strips to (almost) all planks in the same way, i.e. on the starboard and forrard edges of each plank. However, if I continue that practice for the planks joggled into the waterways, I will give myself a quite unnecessary amount of extra work in the form of (parts of) joggles that have to be individually caulked. If I switch to putting the caulking on the port edge of the starboard planks instead, I can then caulk a number of joggles at one go with a single length of strip, as is already possible on the port side of the deck.

To be continued …
Mattias
kkk