Richard, that’s an amazing bit of research! The only problem is that it leaves you with little or no room for discretion without feeling guilty!
I always felt that her builders were very clever in simulating the sweeping sheerline at the bow. The reality was that most of the hull had no actual sheer but there was an upward angle at the bow. The discrepancy was smoothed by the paint line between the black and white. From most angles this worked fine but the trick is very evident in some photos when you look at them closely. QE2 was not the only ship to which this effect was applied. Today of course, modern cruise ships make no pretence that they have no sheer. Your old Disney ships are an exception in simulating a sheer line.
That sort of precision on your spreadsheet is a huge contrast with my ss Miltiades liner of 1903 build where the data is sparse and inconsistent between the various sources that are available. This just leaves me with an educated ‘best guess’ based on what is there in the knowledge that nobody else will be able to disprove it due to the mists of time.
Silver Mist on the other hand is a bit of a free for all. Vic’s drawing was no more than an assessment based on photos of a prototype and simplified for beginners. I have used this base to build a model of a hypothetical motor yacht which never existed but which draws on detailing of several contemporary vessels that were actually built by the designer concerned. It gives me a lot of freedom and an opportunity to take the line of least resistance and do my own thing to create a non existent but plausible model.
I have now fitted the davit supports to my Silver Mist. They are quite beefy items and I think will enhance the model. I may offer it to Lindsey as an article in due course as an example of how a basic beginner’s plan can be developed into a near scale model.
Colin