Posted by Paul T on 07/02/2018 14:51:40:
Chris
Thank you for your comments.
Likening hovercraft to trains was merely to demonstrate that hovercraft can be used in most surface transport applications, I agree that trains require tracks to run on and hovercraft don't but both can be used to carry people or cargo overland from A to B.
A hovercraft does ride on a cushion of air and there is a gap between the ground and the skirt.
The whole point of a hovercraft is that it has the power to lift it off the ground, admittedly only 300mm but it still fulfills the requirement of being airborne, and when hovering 'flying' over water or solid ground it is perfectly stable.
Paul
The point I was trying to make Paul, is that yes, they are stable when just above the ground but a little higher they wouldn't be!
On/just above the ground they are self-stabilising in that if they go out of level air spills from under the skirt at the high point and it drops down level again. This wouldn't happen any further off the ground and hence the more sophisticated methods of providing lift in VTOL's etc. Without the skirt/ground interface it would be uncontrollable!
I also disagree with you saying that it fulfils the requirement of it being airborne as it is being raised by exerting pressure on the ground/riding on a cushion of air rather than from the air itself.
Chris