While we may want to try to be clever by being flippant the fact still remains that MTM have responsibilities that they are not meeting. There are many subscribers who have remained loyally with the magazine for many years and are happy to pay for their magazine up front to guarantee they get their copy every month.
While it may be well known that the Post Office are disgracefully slow at the moment and what may or may not be done about it is not really the point here. I think all of us are experiencing delays of one form or another but completely loosing something is another thing altogether. Again though that really isn't the point here.
What is the point for me is the fact that MTM pare their print runs to the absolute bare minimum possible for the sake of trimming costs to the lowest they can possibly achieve. What this then means is that, if for whatever reason a magazine is not delivered, there is no back up. To be only two weeks after the publishing date and a publisher to be in a position to say that they have no more copies of a periodical clearly demonstrates that the cost cutting has gone too far.
For whatever reason if a subscription based service is not in a position to be able to guarantee that its subscribers will receive what they have paid for then it is a sad fact that they may loose subscribers. Looking for someone else to blame will not change anything and while the Post Office may be the cause of the initial issue MTM have also failed by not having any reserve in place to deal with what any reasonable person would expect to be natural wastage.