Hi If Anthony is happy with the present performance
‘Although the boat goes very well, (a little bit fast at times)’ (first post on this thread), why bung in a bigger motor, another £25.
As for the MFA Torpedo 850 altho a nice motor, it does not (theoretically) provide as much power as a Graupner speed 600. However the speed 600 is designed to run at much higher RPM, and as such needs to have a smaller prop to allow it to generate the higher power. The Torpedo 850 is a much lower revving motor but has a high torque, as such it is much happier with bigger props.
Its horses for courses,
Having spent time looking at some of the motor performance evaluation programs (where you can predict the motors characteristics) and proved to my own satisfaction how effective they are(or are not) My winter project is to play with some props and try to evaluate their characteristics in an efford to be able to answer
‘using an ?motor at ?V and on an ? prop’ for best results be it efficiency or performance.
I’m not sure if a 50 x prop at 1000rpm is better than a 40 s at 2500rpm, but i’m going to try to devise some test to see which is which.
OFF soapbox Tom