water jet boat

Advert

water jet boat

Home Forums Beginners water jet boat

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #90367
    jeffrey mundell 1
    Participant
      @jeffreymundell1

      i am building a guided missle boat and i am going to use a water jet propulation simular to the Grapner ones.

      what i want to know is ,the outlet pipe should this be under the water,or half way or what is recommended

      regards Jeff

      Advert
      #2945
      jeffrey mundell 1
      Participant
        @jeffreymundell1
        #90368
        Paul T
        Participant
          @pault84577

          Hello Jeff

          We will need a little more information such as:

          Are you building from plans?

          What is the type / name of the full size ship?

          Have you tried researching water jets on the internet?

          Paul

          #90371
          Chris Fellows
          Participant
            @chrisfellows72943

            Hi Jeff

            From the little I know of jet drives the height of the outlet is governed by the position of the inlet which is set into the bottom of the hull which results in the outlet being close to the bottom of the boat. So the position of the outlet is determined by the manufacturer of the drive.

            The outlet is usually a quite large diameter and so at low speed the outlet will be partly or completely immersed in water but up to speed/on the plane the outlet will be completely above the water.

            Chris

            Edited By Chris Fellows on 28/07/2020 17:28:39

            #90375
            Empire Parkstone
            Participant
              @empireparkstone

              on My Pibber at low speed the jets are completely below surface and as speed in creases and planes they are deeper. This creates a furrow astern the jets are firing down at whatever the hull angle the the Plume you see is coming from below surfacecapture.jpg

              #90380
              ashley needham
              Participant
                @ashleyneedham69188

                I think Chris has it. If you buy jet units, you do not have a say in where the outlets are if you have the inlets on the bottom skin.

                Ashley

                #90381
                Empire Parkstone
                Participant
                  @empireparkstone

                  How can the outlets be OUT of the water Ashley think again

                  #90382
                  Chris Fellows
                  Participant
                    @chrisfellows72943

                    You're not thinking that the water jet has to be below the water level for it to drive the boat forward are you, as in it pushing against the water!

                    Your boat doesn't look to be fully on the plane. If it was it would be riding more level and the water jets would be partly or fully out of the water. Plenty of videos on YouTube showing this.

                    #90383
                    neil hp
                    Participant
                      @neilhp

                      hi, the nozzle for the outlet of the waterjet propulsion is almost always under the water level for maximum efficiency, with the inlet to the jet tunnel on the bilges of the boat.

                      below is my Shannon lifeboat which used twin waterjet drives.

                      don't touch graupner jet drives, as their reversing buckets are very haphazard and not very efficient. go to a company called ocean works……they are as good as the ones on my Shannon, and half the price.

                      Home

                      img_5888.jpg

                      img_5886.jpg

                      #90388
                      Malcolm Frary
                      Participant
                        @malcolmfrary95515

                        A read of the wiki about jet boats indicates that, however counter to intuition, having the outlet above water works better

                        One of the most significant breakthroughs, in the development of the waterjet, was to change the design so it expelled the jetstream above the water line, contrary to many people's intuition. Hamilton discovered early on that this greatly improved performance, compared to expelling below the waterline, while also providing a "clean" hull bottom (i.e. nothing protruding below the hull line) to allow the boat to skim through very shallow water. It makes no difference to the amount of thrust generated whether the outlet is above or below the waterline, but having it above the waterline reduces hull resistance and draught.

                        #90390
                        Empire Parkstone
                        Participant
                          @empireparkstone

                          With a draft of 40 mm centre 30 mm outer she is nearly flat bottomed the jets are 20 mm D going more level well she can This a small boat 21'' and will bounce easily but for the jets to fire above water she'd have to be nosediving.

                          Anyway the OP asked if the jets had to be below or partially above the waterline I say below the internal plumbing layout also determines it as the props need to be submerged

                          Very nice Neil I was tempted to get some buckets but so far touch wood as she will turn on the spot

                          #90392
                          Chris Fellows
                          Participant
                            @chrisfellows72943

                            Whilst a water jet will work above or below the water a video I watched on water jet design said that they are more efficient and provide more thrust when the expelled water is above the water due to hydraulic action sapping some of the energy when below the water i.e. the full flow of the jet of water is fighting against the mass of water and reducing the thrust. Therefore most full size speedboats/fast craft will have the outlet partly submerged when at rest so that it becomes completely clear when on the plane. If they worked on the principle of pushing against the water they'd be a lot of spray and little forward motion!

                            Probably a bit academic as regards models unless it's a racing boat and as I said at the start the outflow will be determined by the design of the unit bought.

                            As Paul says, it will be interesting to see the design of the boat.

                            Chris

                            #90400
                            jeffrey mundell 1
                            Participant
                              @jeffreymundell1

                              with regards to Paul T comments i am building a OSA MK1 missile boat 32" long x6 1/2"beam.

                              i am building from aEezebilt drawings but much modified to the construction of orignal

                              regards Jeff

                              #90405
                              Paul T
                              Participant
                                @pault84577

                                Hi Jeff

                                From my limited knowledge the OSA type were prop driven so with your build you don't have to worry about getting the jets in the correct scale position on the stern.

                                As some members have already explained the location of the jet outlets (being a one piece unit) is governed by where the inlets are fitted.

                                These photos are self explanatory as they clearly indicate the relationship between the inlet and outlet.

                                jet 1.jpg

                                jet 2.jpg

                                This photo is a pair of Graupner jets in action and clearly show the jet outlet in relationship to the surrounding water level.

                                jet 3.jpg

                                This should help you with your project.

                                Paul

                                 

                                Edited By Paul T on 29/07/2020 14:45:15

                                #90409
                                Chris Fellows
                                Participant
                                  @chrisfellows72943
                                  Posted by Empire Parkstone on 29/07/2020 09:37:01:

                                  With a draft of 40 mm centre 30 mm outer she is nearly flat bottomed the jets are 20 mm D going more level well she can This a small boat 21'' and will bounce easily but for the jets to fire above water she'd have to be nosediving.

                                  Anyway the OP asked if the jets had to be below or partially above the waterline I say below the internal plumbing layout also determines it as the props need to be submerged

                                  Very nice Neil I was tempted to get some buckets but so far touch wood as she will turn on the spot

                                  EP – when truly on the plane the rear of the boat will lift and a hole will be formed behind the transom and so the water jets will be firing above the water level without the nose having to point down which it won't anyway. If your boat is at full throttle it needs a bit more omph!!

                                  Jeff – sorry to go off at a bit of a tangent but that's what usually happens on here and hopefully all relevant. Hopefully you are clear now. Keep posting about your build.

                                  Chris

                                  Edited By Chris Fellows on 29/07/2020 15:15:40

                                  #90411
                                  jeffrey mundell 1
                                  Participant
                                    @jeffreymundell1

                                    Many thanks to all,i think i have enough info to understand water jets.

                                    I will keep you informed as to progress and photos

                                    best regards to all

                                    Jeff

                                    #90424
                                    Tim Rowe
                                    Participant
                                      @timrowe83142

                                      There is some confusion creeping in here. Jets are nearly always underwater when the boat is on its static waterline but when a boat moves its waterline changes. On a planing boat the water break away from the transom so although the jets are still below the static waterline they are not now working underwater. That the difference and Chris was on the right track

                                      In principle a jet is a precision pump whose function is to squirt water out the back. Some of the water going through the pump is due to suction especially at low speeds but the ram effect contribution increases with speed. Jets do not need to push against anything to make them work. They work on a reaction principle and in that way they are different from propellers, ducted propellers and thrusters. The impellers also operate at very high speeds as usually there is direct drive with no reduction gearboxes. The outlet nozzles are nearly always convergent as this accelerates the flow. This is important.

                                      One of Newton's famous laws is that if you double the speed applied to any given mass the force is quadrupled. Velocity if the jet is therefore paramount to maximising the applied force (reaction). While jets do work under water, they coming into their own venting into atmosphere as this provides the least possible hindrance to the velocity.

                                      Think of a fire hose. A plain hose will pump out lots of water but it won't travel very far. Add a normal tapered nozzle and you now have a very powerful jet that may require four firemen to control. The reaction has increased enormously. If you now stick the nozzle in water. The force will dramatically reduce. A simple experiment that you can do with a garden hose and a bucket.

                                      True water jets are not used on displacement vessels for all the above reasons,. Other methods are more efficient. Even the lifeboat which is likely to be semi displacement will probably have the water breaking away from the transom at cruising speed but there may be other compelling reason such as being able to operate in shallow water. Most lifeboats are not jet driven.

                                      This was discussed in Bob Abell's Brutus thread and Paul T did not agree with me. I did not want to hijack that thread and this one presented a better opportunity for a fuller explanation.

                                      Tim R

                                      #90426
                                      Empire Parkstone
                                      Participant
                                        @empireparkstone

                                        Chris sorry I missed your bit about more Oooomph no it wasn' t near full throttle that was just a snap shot from a video it is more than fast enough . Interesting articles

                                        #90449
                                        John Adkins 1
                                        Participant
                                          @johnadkins1

                                          an intresting jet boat to look at is the marine alutech jet boat with a patria mortar fitted, these were designed for the finnish navy to patrol and land troops on the hundreds of islands they have to patrol, or just google m16 watercat they did use rroyce drives but i think they they now use scania,s they also use some very interesting weaponary on them. I have just finnished my AMV18 marine alutech watercat ihave used twin kerber jet drives, will post some photos when i get a chance.

                                          #90451
                                          neil hp
                                          Participant
                                            @neilhp
                                            Posted by Malcolm Frary on 29/07/2020 09:26:19:

                                            A read of the wiki about jet boats indicates that, however counter to intuition, having the outlet above water works better

                                            One of the most significant breakthroughs, in the development of the waterjet, was to change the design so it expelled the jetstream above the water line, contrary to many people's intuition. Hamilton discovered early on that this greatly improved performance, compared to expelling below the waterline, while also providing a "clean" hull bottom (i.e. nothing protruding below the hull line) to allow the boat to skim through very shallow water. It makes no difference to the amount of thrust generated whether the outlet is above or below the waterline, but having it above the waterline reduces hull resistance and draught.

                                            that is a very strange comment from Hamilton of New Zealand as they are committed to supply the RNLI with enough jet propulsion units to equip at least 40 proposed Shannon class lifeboats for the next 25 years plus spares and repairs , and all of those jets have their outlets below water.

                                            however the theory is not a new one as the first lifeboat, using water jet propulsion was built in 1886 [yes 1886] was called Duke of Northumberland, served at New Brighton for some years and had both pairs of forward and reverse jet thrusts ABOVE the waterline………..there really is nothing new to modern technology………all been worked out and done before, lol.

                                            #90452
                                            ashley needham
                                            Participant
                                              @ashleyneedham69188

                                              Neil. One has to assume the RNLI has a clever design for these units? Sometimes you cant tell exactly how these things work by looking at them statically.

                                              As an agreement to jets working above water, Trevor`s little fireman SAM boat has its very own bow thruster in the form of Sam`s squirty hose which is well clear of the deck let alone the pond, and this turns the boat amazingly well.

                                              Ashley

                                              #90455
                                              neil hp
                                              Participant
                                                @neilhp

                                                I think they are just "off the shelf" units Ashley………..they make all sizes of them apparently.

                                                #90458
                                                Chris Fellows
                                                Participant
                                                  @chrisfellows72943

                                                  Neil

                                                  They are under the water when stationary and at low and medium speeds but at full chat when max. thrust and efficiency is required they are pretty much out of the water.

                                                  Chris

                                                  shannon.jpg

                                                  #90461
                                                  neil hp
                                                  Participant
                                                    @neilhp
                                                    Posted by Chris Fellows on 30/07/2020 22:29:00:

                                                    Neil

                                                    They are under the water when stationary and at low and medium speeds but at full chat when max. thrust and efficiency is required they are pretty much out of the water.

                                                    Chris

                                                    shannon.jpg

                                                    that's an incredible shot of our flank boat Chris……….never seen that one….just shows what I didn't know..amazing. cheers.

                                                    #90466
                                                    ashley needham
                                                    Participant
                                                      @ashleyneedham69188

                                                      ……and that just the bath test!,

                                                      Ashley

                                                    Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                                                    • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                                                    Code of conduct | Forum Help/FAQs

                                                    Advert

                                                    Latest Replies

                                                    Home Forums Beginners Topics

                                                    Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                                                    Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                                                    View full reply list.

                                                    Advert

                                                    Newsletter Sign-up