Running time better on a monoperm than a 550? ..Yes, only because mick has a small prop which equates to a light load on the monoperm motor…. It would be the other way round with a large prop where the 550 would be giving more power and the smaller monoperm would be near to stall and red hot ..
http://www.mellorelectrics.co.uk/English/HTML/E_RSDC.html The 555 on this link would be closer to a monoperm although that is not the point Allan is trying to establish.? What I tried to clear up in my reply post is that one brand of motor is no better or more efficient than another.
http://docs-europe.electrocomponents.com/webdocs/002e/0900766b8002ed31.pdf is a link to a typical small dc motor data sheet which has both tabular and graphical data on page 2….
The motor output power curve is missing but it can be plotted because….
Output Power, P (watts) = ang speed (Radians per second) x Torque (Newtonmetre)
or P (watts) = 0.105 x R.P.M. x Torque (Nm)
The output power curve starts at zero at the origin,peaks out at the 50% load and falls back to zero at stall point. So if you start with a 5mm prop and gradually increase load torque with a 100 mm prop you pass the point where increasing prop size increases power .SAME GOES FOR ALL SIMILAR MOTORS.
If you have (at a given voltage) graphs or such monoperm parameters as
- stall torque and current OR motor constant (Nm per amp)
- no load speed
You can pick a cheaper replacement.