Captain Bob / Ashley
I suspect that as experienced model builders you are both having a bit leg pulling at our expense but, for Kevins sake, I think it is time to explain why four 850s are 'overkill' for this boat.
As Bob pointed out this hull is designed to slide through the water and as such weight becomes an important factor as the hull has to float high in the water.
Four 850s are simply to heavy for this boat as the motors and ancillaries will weigh the thick end of 2.5 kilos which is 1 kilo over the design weight for the power plant, escs, batteries, shafts etc.
By using four 850s there is a negligible gain in power output but when you consider that all four will only produce 320w then this combination falls well below the power to weight threshold for this design.
Using two 850s just meets the power to weight threshold for this hull as they will provide sufficient thrust for a decent scale speed without having the hull to deep in the water.
The result of using four 850s will be a significantly heavier boat with a slower performance.
In other words it is a classic Jeremy Clarkson case of power not equalling performance.
Getting onto X60 props, the design angle of the propshaft would mean that the X60s would either foul the hull or be rotating so close to the hull as to cause excessive cavitation. I hasten to add that this is based upon the design angle of the propshaft and that the ultimate choice of propellers is down to Bob who, as an expert model builder will have considered all of his options.
Now I feel like a spoil sport but I would hate for Kevin to invest in equipment that he doesn't need.
Paul