thanks for the kind comments lads.
Your right about it not needing much more speed Ashley however I would like to get her slightly more nose down when on the plane. otherwise yes I’m chuffed to bits with her.
Bob my old mate that’s such a common misconception with brushless motors, every one expects that they rev their nuts off!
agreed with the FE boy’s being the 1st in our hobby to employ them that’s the impression they give
however this motor is relatively low revving at 900 rpm/V and that prop isn’t slowing it one jot such is the torque of these low kv motors
hence my plan to up the bty from 7.4 to 11.1v that’s a 50% voltage increase and so a 50% rev increase in theory. in fact prob more like 40% as the poor old motor is only 93% efficient (as opposed to about 60 or 70% for a brushed motor)
also the extra weight of the bigger bty will just about tip the nose down a touch getting her bum out of the water a bit more.
And if that fails to get her level on the plane then a stepped hull modification is planned with a step of just 4mm, just forward of the prop.
then hopefully the prop will run true surface and that will increase its efficiency and as a bonus produce the charicteristic rooster tail that the old lady was famous for. (at 178mph she had a 1/4 mile rooster tail containing an estimated 1/2 a ton of water in it)
Phil