It is really very strange whichever way I look at it. It is certainly not a matter of being born after that era. They were still building the conventional good-lookers until the mid 1960s. A large number of them lasted for about 30 years, so they were still trading into the 1990s. Thousands went to sea in them when they were still quite young, say 17 to 25, so they would be in their 40s and 50s now! I myself have sailed briefly in a ship built in 1920! Apart from that, collectors seem to prefer them to warships. Another reason why being born after that era does not hold water is the evergreen interest in Napoleonic warships. Neither does the "more interesting" theory. To me, one sea battle is pretty much the same as another! The variety of "interesting" things going on in merchant ships is infinitely greater. The old passenger liners were like floating cities combining the old with the new. First class was very sedate and quite, whilst tourist class was a heaving mass of life crammed into the smaller part of the passenger accommodation, whilst the officers and crews formed two more distinct sections. Merchant vessels had long tradition in war that few naval ships could match. San Demetrio, San Alberto, Jervis Bay, Asama Maru, Rochester Castle, Port Jackson, Carnarvon Castle, Mowe, Mary B. Mitchell, Mary Sinclair, Brussels, and many others. Whilst in peacetime, many others have their names in history, Cutty Sark,Titanic, Flying Enterprise, Turmoil, Waratah, Wahine, Thermopylae, Ariel, Taeping, and St Helena (My last ship, Google it as RMS St Helena, if you doubt its fame).
The following words were written by Frank Bullen in 1906, and hold true today:
I think it may justly be inferred that the public do not want to hear about the Mercantile Marine, are entirely indifferent to the status of its members, and are content to take all the benefits to them as they take light and air – as coming in the course of nature, with the management and production of which they have no concern.
This opinion is borne out by my experience throughout our islands as a lecturer on the subject. Talking from the platform, I can always interest my hearers in any phase of the sea without introducing the slightest element of fiction. But I cannot induce them to read the matter up, nor can I find any evidence of the subject having been studied, however cursorily, except by persons who are, or have been, directly connected with it!
This I cannot fail to lament as being, in view of the paramount importance of the subject, quite unnatural and unnecessary, more especially when I see the intense interest manifested by people of all ranks and grades of education in games such as football, cricket and bridge, and the amount of earnest thought expended upon acquiring information concerning them, not only in their present, but in their past history.
Moreover, I know personally working men who have lavished upon horse racing an amount of brain-power that, legitimately applied would have made them a fortune!
Frank T Bullen, 1906
———-
Bob
Edited By Bob Wilson on 17/04/2016 07:46:16