Ah Paul. I am sorry but the projects are secret and my postings reflect this. I am a bit obscure and that is to stop people guessing what it is I am making (not that anyone would guess, but you never know) I will mail you, anyone who wants to see what I am up to can pm me and I will update them.
Paul is of course aware of what I am building, and his input now and then is invaluable. I always welcome input…the Bushy park crew is quite vociferous and this is helpful (once I have given them a good slap for being cheeky).
Todays boating was informative. Project No5 (based on some obscure design) is supposed to perform in a certain fashion, and this has been difficult to achieve. Indeed. we are wondering if the craft actually worked as it was supposed to, and we suspect not. Todays boating used my power meter to ensure that I was not horribly overloading the toddy 28mm outrunner, and all was well. Then I actually turned it loose and conducted more than a few runs with different props and battery types/voltages to see if this made much difference.
There was a bit of blustery wind and so waves on the pond. My experiments lead me to believe that the craft will perform moderately well in the calm, but not as per the designers intention, which we believe to be unattainable.
This is in the reverse to project no3, which I suspect actually runs much better then any craft built by the inventor, in fact, the performance was spectacular, and the inventors trial run (using a low powered motor) appears to be the only run of this particular craft, as if it DID achieved its design criteria, it would have featured strongly in the magazines of the period. sadly there are no such reports.
Building obscure designs is full of uncertainty in that you don't really know if the things worked or not. Certainly Trevor is building and offshoot of project no3, and there is no concrete evidence that this particular craft was built at all, despite the sensational magazine feature
Ashley
Edited By ashley needham on 21/08/2016 20:20:35